call has most of the answer. Both styles share a similar principle but Hapkido has incorporated Korean striking arts into the Daito Ryu-Aikijujitsu method. The syllabus was worked to be more accepted by the newly freed Korean people. After the Japanese occupation ended, anything considered Japanese was frowned upon. So many Japanese martial arts schools that were open but run by Koreans absorbed aspects of banned native styles into the Japanese methods. This is in part how Taekwondo came about.
Aikido is also an offshoot of Daito Ryu-Aikijujitsu. It does not utilize strikes the way Hapkido does and it%26#039;s philosophy is that of defense without causing lasting harm.|||They both have their roots in Daito-Ryu Aikijutsu
Aikido is Japanese. The emphasis is on receiving the opponent%26#039;s momentum and turning it against them. There are typically few strikes taught in Aikido.
Hapkido is Korean. In addition to having similar %26quot;blending%26quot; principle as Aikido, they also will use striking techniques.|||Hapkido has a lot o kicking and sriking techniqes and as I understand it Aikido has none or very little. Hapkido uses grappling as an aspect of the art whereas the art is you might say grappling (joint locks, takedowns, throws) in a sense in Aikido|||Hapkido is Korean
Aikido is Japanese.
Hapkido originated when the Korean housekeeper of a Japanese Aikido master took what he learned back home and started teaching it there.|||Besides what the first post says Aikido is traditionally a defensive art. Using throws and joint locks to resolve a conflict, minimal or no punching or kicking. |||quik and simple hapkidos better
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment