Is traditonal juijitsu more like judo or aikido? (technique wise)?

or is it like what i think it is like and is like both of em put together sept more rough and with no rules... you know pokin eyes... fish hook, grabbin groins... basicly judo put together with aikido with a very martial focus|||Traditional Ju Jutsu does not involve %26quot;pokin eyes... fish hook, grabbin groins%26quot; at all. Traditional Ju Jutsu is very disciplined, working on waza (techniques) and henke (variations of techniques) done in seated, half-standing, and standing positions. There are rules about how we step into the dojo, how we line up to bow in, how we bow in, how we challenge each other, how we thank each other for partnering, you name it. Yes, there are throws (otoshi) and sweeps (nage) but most of traditional ju jutsu involves immobilizing a partner with controlling locks.





Traditional Ju Jutsu is nothing like Brazilan Ju Jutsu, which you may have seen in UFC fightsl





Since both Judo and Ju Jutsu originated from Aikido, I would say that traditional Ju Jutso is more like Aikido. Neither Aikido nor Ju Jutsu are competitive sports, while Judo is an Olympic sport.|||i thought otoshi was drop and nage was throw? Report Abuse
|||Hehehe...okay, a little history lesson. All of these stemmed from aiki-jutsu, a grappling art used to remove swords and other weapons from opponents. It was the absolute last resort after someone lost their weapon or found themselves on the ground. These techniques were desperate, efficient, and designed to kill. Many call it %26quot;aiki jiu-jitsu%26quot; and therefore confuse it with modern jiu-jitsu, which is understandably much less fierce. From aiki-jutsu stemmed three different directions of thought- aikido ( a softer form that uses an attacker%26#039;s movement against themselves with soft blocks, circular patterns, and joint manipulations), modern jiu-jitsu (a hard grappling art with joint locks), and judo (a throwing art). All three arts have elements of the others in it because they have the same origin.|||Judo. Judo was originally created by taking Jiujitsu and focusing more on the throws and standing technique and less on the newaza or matwork that Jiujitsu focuses on.





Also, there are no pokin eyes, fish hook, grabbin groins etc. in Jiujitsu, unless you happen to be fighting a dirty player.





Aikido is more wrist action and is more defensive, while Judo and Jiujitsu can be used offensively if you get in close enough.|||It seems you have answered some of your own question. I would only add that I%26#039;ve been locked up, choked out, thrown, punched, swept, kicked, chopped, gouged, dropped, stomped and pinned by practitioners of all of these systems. (Except Judo whose rules restrict some of this). None is more effective than the other-only the user determines how effective he or she can be. I can do all of these things but I choose to practice Aiki. You could say my reason is the %26#039;golden rule%26#039;-however, I can ratchet up the intensity if needed. Because all three of these come from the same source, Daito Ryu Aiki-Bujutsu (Jujutsu) they, individually, represent only subsets of a much larger syllabus or body of knowledge, Which, by the way, includes no fewer than three dozen different weapons with a set of syllabus all there own. To learn one and not at least experience some of the others may give you an incomplete picture-nonetheless, if you practice with passion and intense focus for long enough, you should become very proficient at resolving conflict and defending yourself and others with much less effort than the non-martial trained person. Does this help?|||all of the styles judo, akido and ju jitsu are based on the same martial arts from the regions of mainland japan they are different but the same you should take some lessons in all three and see what i mean|||Technique wise jujutsu is more like Aikido. Judo has limited itself (in general) to grappling applications. As a result the maai (distance) and deai (timing) are significantly reduced. Jujustsu incorporates all of the judo waza and more. In addition jujutsu addresses striking, kicking, and weapons distances. Aikido addresses most of these distances. Aikido steers away from the full on grappling on the ground together though. Aikido does have it, and it is also known as ne waza. However, to be fair it is not often practiced in most training. Judo is a competitive sport, Aikido is not, and jujutsu is %26amp; isn%26#039;t. That is, classical jujtsu is not a competitive sport, but modern derivations have entered into that realm. You really didn%26#039;t specify if this was modern jujutsu(jujitsu), or classical/traditional. Modern Aikido technically comes mostly from the Daito ryu Aikijujutsu school. This is a jujutsu school, just one that also applied the principle of Aiki. A modern misconception is that this schools technique was to disarm opponents. It is partially true, but the techniques also allow for the infiltration of the space near an armored opponent in a way that allows for the opening up %26amp; penetration of the weak points in classical Japanese armors whether or not either or both opponents are armed or unarmed. Finally, Aikido as stated by the founder is not a fighting art. Although, it does have these elements within it.